Posted by Robert_Burton on November 23, 2015, at 6:08:16
In reply to Lou's urgent warning-what can happen to you » Robert_Burton, posted by Lou Pilder on November 23, 2015, at 4:28:35
> Be not deceived. For just because the defamation against my character is being allowed to be seen as civil by Mr. Hsiung here, that does not mean that what is posted as libelous against me here is true. For Robert posts that I hijack threads with misinformation. The accusation against me is false. For posting my response here is what this forum is for, and that is not hijacking for if it was, then onw could not post a response to what is posted here. And Robert does not stipulate what the misinformation is to him. That could lead vulnerable readers here to their deaths. For they could think that my warnings about the promotion of these drugs here is misinformation when the warnings are facts in the medical literature. The drugs promoted here could cause life-ruining conditions, addiction and death and can cause to taker to want to kill themselves and/or others. This is not misinformation, but support for those parents trying to decide to drug their child or not in collaboration with a psychiatrist. If they are swayed from reading here to drug their child on the basis that the defamation here against me is being allowed to be seen as being supportive by Mr. Hsiug, and their child is made to suffer a horrible death by them, by the drugs, their blood will not be upon me.
> LouYou, Mr Pilder, strike me as a narcissist with a persecution complex. You are, in your current state, incapable of entering into reasonable dialogue, and you seem to prefer to bully and frighten than to reason. One would hope you would seek appropriate medical treatment yourself.
Defamation is not actionable if the putative imputation is true and/or the imputation is made in the public interest. Nor, more fundamentally, can an internet pseudonym be defamed! Internet pseudonyms do not have reputations which are liable to damage in the sense that those of natural persons can be. Again, you betray your utter ignorance in asserting otherwise.
And precisely what body of defamation law do you invoke? The law as settled in the jurisidiction in which I reside? The law where you reside? The law where the site's servers are located?
And have you considered superior laws which might supervene on the application of defamation law, even if it can be invoked successfully? For instance, constitutional law?
You ought to take some time and have a good hard look at yourself and your conduct.
You are often a menacing and anxiety-inducing member here, and you clearly have not the slightest degree of remorse or even concern for the negative effect you can have on others here who wish to participate reasonably and conscientiously.
If your interventions and so-called "warnings" were very infrequent, then they would be tolerable. But you insist on issuing them - as if you have some special prerogative to do so - whenever you have the chance, which given the largely unmoderated nature of this forum, is often. Your scare-mongering is a species of gross incivility, as are your intrusive "warnings" in threads whose specific subject-matter you make little or no effort to understand and engage with at all. Such indifference and self-centredness is an odious discourtesy to the original poster and those members who seek to contribute relevantly with that poster's concerns at the forefront of their minds.
I find your conduct close to inexcusable, and your total lack of any contrition loathsome.
This is my final post and you will, I suspect, therefore congratulate yourself for the success of your harassment in ostracising yet another member who had the effrontery to question the objective merits of your contributions to this site.
poster:Robert_Burton
thread:1080645
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20151119/msgs/1084141.html