Re: Are generics always inferior to name brand?

Posted by jono_in_adelaide on August 2, 2012, at 0:29:21

In reply to Are generics always inferior to name brand?, posted by alchemy on August 1, 2012, at 20:09:17

I am convinced that this is largely mind over matter, the FDA and their equivalents in other countries requirs substantial bioavaliability testing of generics before they are allowed onto the market - you cant set your self up stamping out diazepam and sertraline tablets just because you think it would be a good money spinner.
Power of suggestion is a potent force!

Thread

Are generics always inferior to name brand? alchemy 8/1/12
Re: Are generics always inferior to name brand? » alchemy Phillipa 8/1/12
Re: Are generics always inferior to name brand? jono_in_adelaide 8/2/12
Re: Are generics always inferior to name brand? » jono_in_adelaide Emme_V2 8/2/12
Re: Are generics always inferior to name brand? SLS 8/2/12
Re: Are generics always inferior to name brand? b2chica 8/2/12
Re: Are generics always inferior to name brand? bleauberry 8/2/12
Re: Are generics always inferior to name brand? sheilac 8/3/12

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:jono_in_adelaide thread:1022590
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120718/msgs/1022608.html

	for
in