Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Animal models of psychiatric illness

Posted by linkadge on May 2, 2006, at 18:31:07

In reply to Re: Animal models of psychiatric illness » linkadge, posted by zeugma on May 2, 2006, at 17:34:43

I think the animal models are valuble. I have to admit that some of the testing seems pretty sick to me. When I found out how they tested for potential new painkillers in animals I just about vomited. Thats not the way you treat something that moves and breaths.

Anyhow, so it goes.

>I agree. The disorder they seem most effective >for is OCD. dapoxetine, Lilly's new SSRI, is >going to be marketed for premature ejaculation, >and it may prove more efficacious for that >indication than for any mood disorder. Which is >frustrating, to say the least.

Thats exactly it. Zyprexa is probably a better weight gain pill than a antipsychotic. The best I could get from SSRI's was numb. Sure, they shut off certain circutry that I could do without, but they shut off a whole lot more.

Its hard to explain to a doctor how the drug makes you feel better, and yet *so* much worse all at the same time.

>Since we really have no clues as to the >underlying disorder in each person's case, >doctors use SSRI's as the most innocuous >choice, and the one that saves the labor of >diagnosis. I wish more thought went into >diagnosis, myself, but that study of 'teenage >pre-psychotics' shows me where diagnostic >skills go- into making money for pharma. It >makes me despair. It really does.


Its really pathetic. I just don't see how drug companies havn't changed their tactics yet. They don't think we can't see through these studies. Geez, I hope they've got represititives reading these boards. I don't know how some of these drug companies live with themselves. A good company would require all of its workers and drug reps to ingest the drug they push for 3 weeks and after that decide what is, and what is not an appropriate application.

>I would be curious to know why amineptine is a >more effective AD than Ritalin, if it is. Just >like I am curious as to why atomoxetine is less >of an AD than desipramine, if it really is.

Some studies have found positive application of ritalin in depression:

http://biopsychiatry.com/methdep.htm

Yeah. I personally found that ritalin was an effective antidepresant. I had no compulsion to increase the dose. I found it helped my anhedonia, and I was able to get pleausure out of things I enjoyed doing, like playing the piano.

But you're right, it is strange that two drugs with similar mehanisms don't work the same.

Linkadge


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:linkadge thread:638491
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060429/msgs/639378.html