![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
[email protected]Shown: posts 128 to 152 of 152. Go back in thread:
Posted by alexandra_k on May 27, 2005, at 16:51:21
In reply to Q #13, posted by Tamar on May 27, 2005, at 15:14:38
Well, I'll be boring and suggest waitress.
Ahem
I mean waiter.
Posted by Tamar on May 27, 2005, at 17:15:58
In reply to Re: Q #13 » Tamar, posted by alexandra_k on May 27, 2005, at 16:51:21
> Well, I'll be boring and suggest waitress.
> Ahem
> I mean waiter.Sorry, no. Neither a waitress nor a waiter!
Posted by littleone on May 27, 2005, at 21:20:39
In reply to Q #13, posted by Tamar on May 27, 2005, at 15:14:38
> What was Sean Connery's job before he became an actor?
>
I'm gonna guess a butcher.
Posted by Tamar on May 28, 2005, at 1:41:10
In reply to Re: Q #13 » Tamar, posted by littleone on May 27, 2005, at 21:20:39
> > What was Sean Connery's job before he became an actor?
> >
> I'm gonna guess a butcher.Not a butcher. Sorry!
Posted by TamaraJ on May 28, 2005, at 14:43:10
In reply to Re: Q #13 » littleone, posted by Tamar on May 28, 2005, at 1:41:10
Was he a carpenter? (I remember reading about an actor who had worked as a carpenter before becoming an actor, but it may have been someone else that I am thinking of).
Posted by Tamar on May 28, 2005, at 15:25:26
In reply to Re: Q #13 » Tamar, posted by TamaraJ on May 28, 2005, at 14:43:10
> Was he a carpenter? (I remember reading about an actor who had worked as a carpenter before becoming an actor, but it may have been someone else that I am thinking of).
I think you're thinking of Harrison Ford (apparently he has a perfect plumb!). Sean Connery wasn't a carpenter. Hmm... I'll try to think of a clue...
Posted by Tamar on May 28, 2005, at 16:57:13
In reply to Re: Q #13, posted by Tamar on May 28, 2005, at 15:25:26
Posted by TamaraJ on May 28, 2005, at 19:42:15
In reply to Re: Q #13, posted by Tamar on May 28, 2005, at 15:25:26
Harrison Ford, yes, that's the one who was the carpenter.
Yes, I think a clue would be nice :-)
> > Was he a carpenter? (I remember reading about an actor who had worked as a carpenter before becoming an actor, but it may have been someone else that I am thinking of).
>
> I think you're thinking of Harrison Ford (apparently he has a perfect plumb!). Sean Connery wasn't a carpenter. Hmm... I'll try to think of a clue...
>
>
Posted by Tamar on May 28, 2005, at 20:49:26
In reply to Re: Q #13 » Tamar, posted by TamaraJ on May 28, 2005, at 19:42:15
So... a clue about Sean Connery's previous employment:
It wasn't his lines he delivered back then.
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 28, 2005, at 20:53:18
In reply to Q #13, posted by Tamar on May 27, 2005, at 15:14:38
> What was Sean Connery's job before he became an actor?
I know of five jobs he held before he was an actor. Six, if you count his stint in the Navy.
Which one you looking for?Milkman, sailor, bricklayer, lifeguard, coffin polisher (seriously), body-builder/model.
Which one you looking for?
Lar
Posted by alexandra_k on May 28, 2005, at 20:57:46
In reply to Re: Q #13 » Tamar, posted by Larry Hoover on May 28, 2005, at 20:53:18
milk
he used to deliver milk
Posted by Tamar on May 29, 2005, at 4:17:45
In reply to Re: Q #13 » Tamar, posted by Larry Hoover on May 28, 2005, at 20:53:18
> I know of five jobs he held before he was an actor. Six, if you count his stint in the Navy.
> Which one you looking for?
>
> Milkman, sailor, bricklayer, lifeguard, coffin polisher (seriously), body-builder/model.
>
> Which one you looking for?I would have been happy with any of those! The one I thought people might have heard of was milkman (apparently with a horse-drawn milk cart, though that may be romanticized fluff). Alex was right too, but you were first.
(I met Sean Connery once. He sure has charisma!)
Posted by alexandra_k on May 29, 2005, at 5:40:54
In reply to Re: Q #13 » Larry Hoover, posted by Tamar on May 29, 2005, at 4:17:45
I just put larry's milk suggestion
together with your delivery suggestion.
Thats as smart as I can be on this thread ;-)
Posted by Tamar on May 29, 2005, at 7:36:14
In reply to Re: Q #13, posted by alexandra_k on May 29, 2005, at 5:40:54
> I just put larry's milk suggestion
> together with your delivery suggestion.
> Thats as smart as I can be on this thread ;-)You are smart on all threads!
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 29, 2005, at 7:55:21
In reply to Re: Q #13 » alexandra_k, posted by Tamar on May 29, 2005, at 7:36:14
> > I just put larry's milk suggestion
> > together with your delivery suggestion.
> > Thats as smart as I can be on this thread ;-)
>
> You are smart on all threads!I think Alexandra wins. I gave six answers. Coffin polisher?
Lar
Posted by Tamar on May 30, 2005, at 4:47:00
In reply to Re: Q #13 » Tamar, posted by Larry Hoover on May 29, 2005, at 7:55:21
> I think Alexandra wins. I gave six answers. Coffin polisher?
OK; and yes indeed: the idea of James Bond as a onetime coffin polisher is somewhat ironic...
Posted by alexandra_k on May 31, 2005, at 20:27:34
In reply to Alexandra - I think you're next, posted by Tamar on May 30, 2005, at 4:47:00
Sorry.
Um...
I can't think of anything, so at the risk of sounding like a psych textbook:
Who said
(not exact quote..)
'psychology after first bargaining away its soul... and then going out of its mind... seems now to have lost all consciousness'
Or alternatively:
Which three stages of psychology is the quote referring to?????
Posted by Tamar on June 1, 2005, at 12:49:18
In reply to Re: Oh... Okay... » Tamar, posted by alexandra_k on May 31, 2005, at 20:27:34
> Who said
>
> (not exact quote..)
>
> 'psychology after first bargaining away its soul... and then going out of its mind... seems now to have lost all consciousness'
>I love the quote. I have no idea who said it, but I think it's great!
Posted by alexandra_k on June 1, 2005, at 15:39:38
In reply to Re: Oh... Okay... » alexandra_k, posted by Tamar on June 1, 2005, at 12:49:18
Google will help you
Posted by Larry Hoover on June 1, 2005, at 16:51:50
In reply to Re: Oh... Okay... » Tamar, posted by alexandra_k on May 31, 2005, at 20:27:34
> Sorry.
>
> Um...
>
> I can't think of anything, so at the risk of sounding like a psych textbook:
>
> Who said
>
> (not exact quote..)
>
> 'psychology after first bargaining away its soul... and then going out of its mind... seems now to have lost all consciousness'
>
> Or alternatively:
>
> Which three stages of psychology is the quote referring to?????Are ye talking aboot Shevenell? If ye are, ye mangled the quote.
Lar
Posted by alexandra_k on June 1, 2005, at 23:31:13
In reply to Re: Oh... Okay... » alexandra_k, posted by Larry Hoover on June 1, 2005, at 16:51:50
As Burt (1962) writes, "psychology, having first bargained away its soul and then gone out of its mind, seems now...to have lost all consciousness" (p.229).
http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/pizzurro.html
Now I think it goes...
Psychology - study of the psyche / soul...
But then it became the 'science' of the mind / consciousness (hence bargained away its soul) round the time of structuralism...Then it 'went out of its mind' when it became the science ('just like physics' heh heh) of behaviour - behaviourism...
Then it lost consciousness with modern cognitive psychology because it talks of mental processes in terms of 'information processing' and doesn't mention consciousness much at all...
But that was a hard one so I'll give it to you.
Your up :-)
Posted by littleone on June 2, 2005, at 0:57:50
In reply to Re: Oh... Okay... » Larry Hoover, posted by alexandra_k on June 1, 2005, at 23:31:13
Posted by Larry Hoover on June 3, 2005, at 17:27:00
In reply to Re: Oh... Okay... » Larry Hoover, posted by alexandra_k on June 1, 2005, at 23:31:13
> As Burt (1962) writes, "psychology, having first bargained away its soul and then gone out of its mind, seems now...to have lost all consciousness" (p.229).
>
> http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/pizzurro.html
>
> Now I think it goes...
> Psychology - study of the psyche / soul...
> But then it became the 'science' of the mind / consciousness (hence bargained away its soul) round the time of structuralism...
>
> Then it 'went out of its mind' when it became the science ('just like physics' heh heh) of behaviour - behaviourism...
>
> Then it lost consciousness with modern cognitive psychology because it talks of mental processes in terms of 'information processing' and doesn't mention consciousness much at all...
>
> But that was a hard one so I'll give it to you.Uh, I said a different man entirely. The quotation I was referring to was Professor R. H. Shevenell summing up Descartes' influence by saying:
"With Descartes, psychology lost its soul and found its mind: with British Empiricists, soul lost its mind and found its consciousness: with Watson and the Behaviorists, soul lost its consciousness and found is reflexes."
> Your up :-)
Uh, I think you need to do another question. Yours didn't really get answered, IMHO.
Lar
Posted by Larry Hoover on June 3, 2005, at 17:27:42
In reply to You mean the others were easy???? :O (nm) » alexandra_k, posted by littleone on June 2, 2005, at 0:57:50
Easy enough, with Google available.
Lar
Posted by alexandra_k on June 3, 2005, at 17:43:54
In reply to Re: Oh... Okay... » alexandra_k, posted by Larry Hoover on June 3, 2005, at 17:27:00
> Uh, I said a different man entirely. The quotation I was referring to was Professor R. H. Shevenell summing up Descartes' influence by saying:
> "With Descartes, psychology lost its soul and found its mind:But but but... For Descartes the mind JUST WAS the soul. And he didn't lose it exactly... It is right there, you know, in the immaterial mind-stuff :-)
>with British Empiricists, soul lost its mind and found its consciousness: with Watson and the Behaviorists, soul lost its consciousness and found is reflexes."
Oh. I hadn't heard of that quote.....
Interesting...
> Uh, I think you need to do another question. Yours didn't really get answered, IMHO.Oh no you don't.
Please don't make me come up with another question.
I'm no good at that.
Your quote was verrrrrrrrrrrrrry similar.
Close enough IMO.
Though... To be picky... Descartes (rationalism) and Locke, Berkely, Hume (empiricists) are more schools in the history of early modern philosophy than in psychology...But thats ok ;-)
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
[email protected]
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.