Psycho-Babble Psychology Thread 488857

Shown: posts 14 to 38 of 44. Go back in thread:

 

Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » alexandra_k

Posted by Dinah on April 24, 2005, at 22:02:49

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » Dinah, posted by alexandra_k on April 24, 2005, at 21:09:22

I think the only way I'd learn pure psychoanalytic theory is with someone explaining it to me in the places I get stuck. Reading just doesn't do it.

Reading about CBT, especially the B part, tends to annoy me. It seems like they've missed some vital part of humanity with behavior modification. But other parts of it are useful, and I suppose we all need to sit down and figure out when we're distorting sometimes.

I like learning about the interpersonal relational therapies best - short of pure Freudian or Jungian analytic. I just have a hard time believing I'm all *that* complex. :) If I feel that CBT reduces me to something a bit less than human, I feel that analytic therapy gives me waaaay too much credit. But Yalom or Kottler, now that seems juuuust right.

Which is not to say I wouldn't like to learn Freud or Jung. I'd just need a lot of help.

If you ever want to revive the old PB book club, with psychology as a topic, let me know. I think I'd enjoy reading the harder stuff with people who are a bit or more than a bit smarter than I am.

 

Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » Dinah

Posted by annierose on April 24, 2005, at 22:08:53

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » alexandra_k, posted by Dinah on April 24, 2005, at 22:02:49

Not to take this thread way off topic, but Dinah, you mentioned something over in social about "collecting" therapy stories. Besides Yalom, are there any fiction books you have enjoyed re:therapy. I'd be interested. Thanks in advance.

 

You'll have to excuse me... » alexandra_k

Posted by messadivoce on April 24, 2005, at 23:38:34

In reply to Re: If I were a therapist.... » messadivoce, posted by alexandra_k on April 24, 2005, at 21:04:16

I'm glad you find the sarcastic, smart *ssed side of me amusing. :-) I am usually able to talk reasonably about this termination, but not today. Today it hurts like hell. Ouch Ouch Ouch.

My T was psychodynamic, so he encouraged me to open up and trust him. That was like, the major theme of my therapy. TRUST. I'm not like your dad, he said. I'm not trying to hurt you. You're safe. It's safe. Be open. Tell me everything.

If we had had all the time in the world, then maybe it would have turned out okay. Maybe we might have ended up moving into the same nursing home to continue treatment. ;-) So here's a proposal. I think that in order to practice psychodynamic therapy, there should be a law that the practitioner must allow at least 20 years for this. Anything less is cause for a lawsuit, and could end up causing irreparable harm to the patient. I mean, it just doesn't work to encourage trust and openness and then only have a VERY limited timeframe in which to work. It's pretty unreasonable to call all those feelings forth that probably take years to work through, and then say, "Okay, put them all back now, you should be cured."

It's like picking up an oyster and yelling, "Make a pearl NOW, dammit!!!"

 

:-) Agreed. New law. (nm) » messadivoce

Posted by Dinah on April 25, 2005, at 0:03:18

In reply to You'll have to excuse me... » alexandra_k, posted by messadivoce on April 24, 2005, at 23:38:34

 

eeeeeeeeeeeeeek (nm)

Posted by Shortelise on April 25, 2005, at 1:00:19

In reply to If I were a therapist...., posted by pinkeye on April 24, 2005, at 16:17:12

 

Why are you eeeeking? (nm) » Shortelise

Posted by messadivoce on April 25, 2005, at 1:38:27

In reply to eeeeeeeeeeeeeek (nm), posted by Shortelise on April 25, 2005, at 1:00:19

 

Re: But nobody would ever agree to work with me...

Posted by alexandra_k on April 25, 2005, at 1:42:00

In reply to You'll have to excuse me... » alexandra_k, posted by messadivoce on April 24, 2005, at 23:38:34

...For 20 years.
The most I have ever had anybody commit to is 8 months.
Wah!

 

Re: Why are you eeeeking? » messadivoce

Posted by Shortelise on April 25, 2005, at 12:06:06

In reply to Why are you eeeeking? (nm) » Shortelise, posted by messadivoce on April 25, 2005, at 1:38:27

because just thinking about this short circuits my mind. I can't go here...

:-)
ShortE

 

Re: If I were a therapist.... » daisym

Posted by pinkeye on April 25, 2005, at 13:16:11

In reply to Re: If I were a therapist.... » pinkeye, posted by daisym on April 24, 2005, at 17:41:27

That's true. But I don't understand why I am so hurt. I have tried my best to understand, but I can't seem to fathom. It doesn't make sense. And I have tried seeking out for help - from both my ex T and my current T. And I don't think they know how to help either. And really it wasn't all that bad..but just that I am hurt way more than it warrants. I must be stupid or something

 

Re: :-) Agreed. New law.

Posted by antigua on April 25, 2005, at 13:47:42

In reply to :-) Agreed. New law. (nm) » messadivoce, posted by Dinah on April 25, 2005, at 0:03:18

Thank goodnes! That means I have six years left. PHew. Hope I can make it.
antigua

 

That was pretty funny :-) » messadivoce

Posted by pinkeye on April 25, 2005, at 14:07:09

In reply to You'll have to excuse me... » alexandra_k, posted by messadivoce on April 24, 2005, at 23:38:34

But I am not sure about the lawsuit thing.. Never in favor of lawsuits myself. Excpet in eggregious irresponsibility cases.

 

Re: If I were a therapist.... » pinkeye

Posted by fallsfall on April 25, 2005, at 17:49:14

In reply to Re: If I were a therapist.... » daisym, posted by pinkeye on April 25, 2005, at 13:16:11

>but just that I am hurt way more than it warrants

This is usually a good indication to me that transference is at work...

 

Re: If I were a therapist.... » fallsfall

Posted by pinkeye on April 25, 2005, at 20:42:46

In reply to Re: If I were a therapist.... » pinkeye, posted by fallsfall on April 25, 2005, at 17:49:14

I am pretty sure it is some form of transference.. He is striking a chord somewhere inside me and I am just responding to that, and I am trying to find out what that is. I haven't seen this person for more than maybe 20 hours in my life time face to face. It is impossible to have this kind of reaction without something else like transference going on. And I meet lot of very smart men everyday, and interact a lot with lot of men on a day to day basis. I don't react this way to anybody else. That is why I have a very strong suspicion that it is definitely transference. BUt I don't know how to resolve it though

 

Re: If I were a therapist.... » pinkeye

Posted by Pfinstegg on April 25, 2005, at 22:20:29

In reply to Re: If I were a therapist.... » fallsfall, posted by pinkeye on April 25, 2005, at 20:42:46

I would have loved to have been a therapist myself, but don't think I would ever be strong enough to do good work with patients, and take good care of myself, also.

To put forward a different perspective, I know, from comments by him here and there, and just the *feel* of being in therapy with him, that my therapist feels it is a privilege to be a psychoanalyst- that it provides a full life of growth and expansion all the way, involving patient care, teaching, writing and having wonderful colleagues. Not that there aren't very painful, discouraging times for him- overcoming those is probably what the growth is about. But i just get the feeling that he loves doing it!

 

Re: If I were a therapist.... » Pfinstegg

Posted by daisym on April 26, 2005, at 1:55:11

In reply to Re: If I were a therapist.... » pinkeye, posted by Pfinstegg on April 25, 2005, at 22:20:29

But i just get the feeling that he loves doing it!

I agree with you that you can feel if they like their jobs or not. I've decided that the pdoc I've seen doesn't really like the commitment it takes to do this work. So she turns her clients into objects. I think that is why she wonders if this the right time to do this work -- God forbid a client need her!

 

Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » annierose

Posted by Dinah on April 26, 2005, at 7:57:27

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » Dinah, posted by annierose on April 24, 2005, at 22:08:53

I have lots of case studies, any I can get my hands on even if they're on topics that don't appeal. Those are sort of fiction, I guess.

But for the most part my books are nonfiction and I collect fictional representations in movies and TV. Like the episode of The Nanny where Fran is so in awe of her therapist until she sees him digging in his nose with his finger at a movie, and is totally disillusioned. Before she sees that, she wonders whether if she greets him and if he asks her how she's doing and she answers fine, if he'll charge her.

I must be one of the few who didn't like "What About Bob?" Not sure if it's my anxiety about people embarassing themselves on screen or if it just cuts too close to home.

But I'll look through my library for fiction once I get those new shelves up in my closet. I'm devoting a whole five shelf bookshelf to the books I don't want in the family library - my therapy books. :) And magazines. Somehow I managed to subscribe to a clinician's magazine.

 

Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » Dinah

Posted by Daisym on April 26, 2005, at 10:40:39

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » annierose, posted by Dinah on April 26, 2005, at 7:57:27

I didn't like What About Bob much either. Totally too close to home. Maybe in a few years?

Probably not.

 

Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » Dinah

Posted by fallsfall on April 26, 2005, at 10:48:51

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » annierose, posted by Dinah on April 26, 2005, at 7:57:27

I like the first half of "What About Bob?" better than the second half. I think I like the idea of following my therapist on vacation.

 

Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » Dinah

Posted by annierose on April 26, 2005, at 15:57:23

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » annierose, posted by Dinah on April 26, 2005, at 7:57:27

Thank you in advance if you can think of a few. I like to read fiction "therapy" books when my T is away on vacation.

 

Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » annierose

Posted by daisym on April 26, 2005, at 16:01:12

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » Dinah, posted by annierose on April 26, 2005, at 15:57:23

Have you read, "Tales of a Traveling Couch?" It is kind of fun. I have a list but I wanted to ask if you were looking for "light" reading or more serious stuff too? I think I spend more money on books than therapy itself. *sigh*

 

Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » daisym

Posted by annierose on April 26, 2005, at 18:54:17

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » annierose, posted by daisym on April 26, 2005, at 16:01:12

Dasiy -
I'd love your list! Thank you!!! You can either post some titles here or babblemail me. I like light and more serious reads ... as long as it's good :)

"Tales ..." looks great. I already put it on my "wish list", which will need some modifying or buying soon.

I'm excited that these titles actually exist. When I try searches, I end up with mostly serious discussions on theory.

THANK YOU! -Annierose

 

Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » annierose

Posted by Dinah on April 26, 2005, at 18:58:39

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » daisym, posted by annierose on April 26, 2005, at 18:54:17

It was good. I also liked one by Jeffrey Kottler. Mummy at the Dining Room Table. I'm not double double quoting it because I'm not sure of the title.

I love all case studies. :)

 

The Mummy at the Dining Room Table » Dinah

Posted by Klokka on April 26, 2005, at 22:39:57

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » annierose, posted by Dinah on April 26, 2005, at 18:58:39

Yep, you got the title right, it's "The Mummy at the Dining Room Table". I read it about a month or so ago, despite really not having the time to do so, and I loved it. :) When I went to buy it, the cashier gushed over how she'd never run into anybody who read that sort of thing, which was interesting.

 

Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » annierose

Posted by daisym on April 26, 2005, at 22:43:41

In reply to Re: I'd love to be a therapist in theory » daisym, posted by annierose on April 26, 2005, at 18:54:17

Ok -- two of my favorite "serious" books are: "Undercurrents" and "Shining Affliction." Both of these are written by therapists who suffered through depression and/or abuse. But they are very sad in places and may trigger, so be careful. I think I've read Shining 10 times.

I also like "The Fifty Minute Hour" which has short case studies, but he doesn't write as well as Yalom. Oliver Sacks wrote a pretty famous collection called, "The Man who Mistook his Wife for a Hat."

Other books I've liked are: "Unholy Ghost" which is a collection of writings; "A general theory of love" which explains alot about attachment; "Between therapist and Client" and "The Intimate Hour" and "The Impossibility of Sex."

I'll stop here. But that should keep you busy for a week.

 

Re: The Mummy at the Dining Room Table

Posted by TofuEmmy on April 27, 2005, at 8:36:24

In reply to The Mummy at the Dining Room Table » Dinah, posted by Klokka on April 26, 2005, at 22:39:57

The best thing about this book is that after reading it, I feel less like my T's wierdest patient. Lordy, it's nice to feel more sane that SOMEONE!

em


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Psychology | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, [email protected]

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.