Shown: posts 1 to 8 of 8. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by floatingbridge on December 12, 2009, at 3:46:27
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/12/health/12medicaid.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hp
Posted by BayLeaf on December 12, 2009, at 7:55:32
In reply to NYT poor children receive more antiphsycotics, posted by floatingbridge on December 12, 2009, at 3:46:27
and if anyone thinks this stops with children, just work in the biz for a while. If you are not well enuf to fight for yourself, you need an advocate to fight for you. So sad.
bay
Posted by linkadge on December 12, 2009, at 8:44:09
In reply to Re: NYT poor children receive more antipsycotics » floatingbridge, posted by BayLeaf on December 12, 2009, at 7:55:32
The lower class children may be with parents who a little less informed about the condition and treatments.
Good way to promote the cycle of poverty though.
Linkadge
Posted by Phillipa on December 12, 2009, at 12:57:29
In reply to Re: NYT poor children receive more antipsycotics, posted by linkadge on December 12, 2009, at 8:44:09
Three year olds? How horribly sad. Phillipa
Posted by Sigismund on December 12, 2009, at 23:12:44
In reply to NYT poor children receive more antiphsycotics, posted by floatingbridge on December 12, 2009, at 3:46:27
The richer/more famous you are, the more euphoric the script?
Posted by Phillipa on December 13, 2009, at 19:24:41
In reply to Re: NYT poor children receive more antiphsycotics, posted by Sigismund on December 12, 2009, at 23:12:44
Personally I don't like to see children that young as three medicated their poor little brains. Maybe better parenting is the answer with emphasis on treating the parents in maybe groups for cost effectiveness. They could discuss their lives, living circumstances, and maybe receive some child raising skills. First of course. Then see what happens? Phillipa
Posted by floatingbridge on December 13, 2009, at 21:19:16
In reply to Re: NYT poor children receive more antiphsycotics, posted by Phillipa on December 13, 2009, at 19:24:41
I don't know. How do you diagnosis (accurately, that is) bipolar in a child of three?
Has anyone seen the new seroquel xr ads on the NYT front page (and all through it, actually)? The medication is referred to as an antidepressant. No slight on serqouel or any of it's uses--just a comment on a marketing 'slippage' of terminology. Would it sell as well if presented as an AP?
fb
Posted by Phillipa on December 14, 2009, at 18:15:35
In reply to Re: NYT poor children receive more antiphsycotics » Phillipa, posted by floatingbridge on December 13, 2009, at 21:19:16
fb sorry just getting to this at doc's half the day but no if it was advertised that way I doubt it. But how would one know if a child of three were depressed anyway? My Son was a very quiet child but he wasn't depressed. Love Phillipa
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, [email protected]
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.