![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
[email protected]Shown: posts 18 to 42 of 59. Go back in thread:
Posted by MM on December 25, 2004, at 20:14:35
In reply to Persistence of adverse effects of SSRIs, posted by ed_uk on December 25, 2004, at 8:13:18
they made me bipolar. I read something (on bipolarworld.com) that it happens a whole lot more than "they" want you to think....like 30-40% of the time, and believe me if I had known those were the chances I wouldn't have taken that stuff, or kept trying different ones etc. even when it made me feel like ripping my skin off. They were marketed well when too new (in my humble opinion) and now we're seeing the truth about them.
Posted by linkadge on December 25, 2004, at 20:59:34
In reply to oh ya, forgot..., posted by MM on December 25, 2004, at 20:14:35
I know of a few psychiatrists who "got out" because they did not believe the practices of modern psychiatry were ethical. Helping human suffering at what cost? Extreme disturbances in the prospects of long term mental health ??
And the drug companies are "gunning it" these days to try and convice everyone they're depressed. Mark my words, psychiatry is going to run into *significant* complications in the next 10-20 years when it realizes its got a generation of SSRI-addicted zombies with drug induced excitotoxicity that makes neural tissue look like swiss cheese.
Linkadge
Posted by MM on December 25, 2004, at 21:45:44
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot..., posted by linkadge on December 25, 2004, at 20:59:34
They're all covered for every possible side effect though ...."may cause turning into smurf and running backwards while talking to carrots or any others we haven't thought of, but you still can't sue us" so, I don't know if they'll be the ones facing the consequences... I didn't even know what mania was, and I believe it said "very rare SE" or something. I think if I'd never have walked into a psychiatrist's office, I'd be a lot better off now. But, who can say (no offense to psychiatrists heh...I know there are a lot of good ones, just not sure if I've found that errrr special one? yet). It just worries me when I walk into the waiting room and see a new px pen and then end up on the med.
Not once was I asked about any of the reasons I wanted to stop being on SSRI's (I was 14, I didn't know how it worked, so I struggled to try to explain the weird things happening) and I just got switched around to different ones, without realizing that I was having mixed states. I kinda thought that was how normal people felt, cuz that's what I'd been hearing; that it would make me normal. I didn't have any kind of real support to help me with the research or anything. We didn't even have the net then. Anyway, sorry for the negative posts...lol maybe it's cuz it's Christmas.Meg
Posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 8:49:59
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot... » linkadge, posted by MM on December 25, 2004, at 21:45:44
The sick thing is the raw statistics. For *most* people who have a depression it rarely lasts longer than 6-8 months, and then it gets better on its own without medication.
Well I have been on AD meds for 5 years now! I can't get off the stuff cause I am addicted to it, and I am more suicidal than ever because of the extreme and apparently permanent side effects I am suffering. I wish I had never taken an antidepressant in my life. I can say that with more cetaintly than I've said anything else.
Linkadge
Posted by mike13 on December 26, 2004, at 12:48:40
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot..., posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 8:49:59
> The sick thing is the raw statistics. For *most* people who have a depression it rarely lasts longer than 6-8 months, and then it gets better on its own without medication.
>
> Well I have been on AD meds for 5 years now! I can't get off the stuff cause I am addicted to it, and I am more suicidal than ever because of the extreme and apparently permanent side effects I am suffering. I wish I had never taken an antidepressant in my life. I can say that with more cetaintly than I've said anything else.
>
> Linkadge
>
>
>What do you mean you're addicted to ad's?? Are you on an SSRI?? How can one get addicted to being apathetic , mindless , emotionless to sum it up feeling completely sub human.. just curious. I'd say I am addicted in the sense that my brain seems to depend on it to function as when it is devoid of a serotonin booster i'm not depressed but I feel extremely slow , I have trouble speaking...etc.. it's like my body depends on it to function normally or something..
Posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 13:33:08
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot..., posted by mike13 on December 26, 2004, at 12:48:40
Thats exactly it. If I stop taking SSRI's I will be lifeless, dumbwitted, insomniac, rageaholoic,unstable, panic-ridden, neurotic, obsessive, delerious, dysthemic, with dystonia, diskinsia, anorexia, migrane, psychosis, agitation, anxiety, akathesia, tremor, sweating, social phobia, IBS, agression, hypertention, unexplained pain, guilt, fear, shock-like sensations, chills, diareah, nausia, diminished sexual desire, nightmares, orgasmic dysfunction, dizziness, abnormal vision, palpations, increased fatiguability, nervousness, apathy, catatonic reaction, virtigo, stupor, confusion, impaired concentration, blushing, mania, psychomotor retardation, abnormal dreams, abnormal thinking, deprersonalization, vomiting, hostility, neuralgia, abnormal speech, impulse control difficulties, delusions, paranoia, hyperventalation, loss of taste, tachycardia, night sweats, and numb extremities.
I suppose you could say I am addicted, or you could call it something else if you like.
Linkadge
Posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 13:34:27
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot..., posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 13:33:08
Oh, and the side effects don't go away, nor do they seem to subside over time.
Linkadge
Posted by mike13 on December 26, 2004, at 18:39:08
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot..., posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 13:34:27
> Oh, and the side effects don't go away, nor do they seem to subside over time.
>
>
> LinkadgeIC what you mean I experience a significant amount of adverse side effects from the SSRI's that seems to persist months after I discontinue the meds...the SSRi's just seem to alleviate these side effects..not eliminate them completely... but I really wouldn't call it an ADDICTION..because of the context it's usually used in people percieve it as a drug you use because of it's euphoric effects .
Posted by francesco on December 26, 2004, at 19:06:25
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot..., posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 13:34:27
I obsessed myself a lot with the possibility that I had got persistent damages from antidepressants. Now I'm taking Anafranil and my obsessions are gone ;-)
This discussion is frightening. I don't wanna hear it ! What's the point in thinking that apathy is dued to antidepressans ? Ok, maybe it's true, maybe it's not, we cannot know it, maybe we're apathetic because our life sucks, maybe because we have failed too often, I think that thinking about meds all day long can have the as consequence that we are unable to see the psychological factors of our problems.
Or maybe this is just what my psychologist says : D
Posted by ed_uk on December 26, 2004, at 19:17:10
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot... » linkadge, posted by francesco on December 26, 2004, at 19:06:25
Hi!
>I think that thinking about meds all day long can have the consequence that we are unable to see the psychological factors of our problems.
I think that this is a very important point.
>What's the point in thinking that apathy is due to antidepressants?
In my case..... because if the apathy IS due to the antidepressant, I need to reduce the dose.
Ed :-)
Posted by MM on December 26, 2004, at 19:30:00
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot... » linkadge, posted by francesco on December 26, 2004, at 19:06:25
Hey Francesco. I understand what you are saying, but I do think that although this discussion is negative, that it is valid. When I was depressed and not on anything, I wasn't apathetic, I was tearful and in pain constantly, or sleeping to escape it. While on just SSRI's I became apathetic and also extremely agitated while still being depressed (although I had energy I was still in a very negative state), which is a bad combination. I had most of the side effects Linkadge described when he/she is off SSRI's while on them and that's why now I'm dx'd BPII. Being on a mood stabilizer and Klonopin, I can sort of handle an SSRI, though I don't like it. Wellbutrin has been the only antidepressant I "like." Even while not on anything else it was the one that I took with the least problem (which is often the case with Bipolars, which is why they are supposed to try Wellbutrin before other AD's). Anyway, my point is that I although I am not doing as good as I have been able to, I am not in the depths of a depression and even when I was doing really well on meds, I still didn't think SSRI's were all they're cracked up to be and the truth is they caused me a lot of problem. I think a fair view of the meds has to include the good and bad. The problems with the SSRI's are valid and that has become more clear now. But, I do apologize if the negativity has been offensive to you (sincerely). And I also think that spending too much time thinking about your disorder and the meds can be a bad thing, like you said.
Meg
Posted by MM on December 26, 2004, at 19:34:35
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot..., posted by mike13 on December 26, 2004, at 12:48:40
Just out of curiosity, have you tried Wellbutrin? It was the only AD I could really handle. Klonopin really helped me as well. I'm diagnosed BPII though, but my symptoms are pretty much just depression and anxiety. The SSRI's drove me up the wall while not being on anything else, but Wellbutrin was a little better, so I just thought if you haven't tried it, maybe you might want to...maybe add it or try it on its own.
Meg
Posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 19:40:39
In reply to To Francesco, posted by ed_uk on December 26, 2004, at 19:17:10
I don't want to take a pill to take away the thoughts that I might be dammaging my brain.
It's not really obsession. Its a simple fact that I the *only* problem that I had before I took SSRI's was that I was a little bit blue.
If I discontinue after this time (5 years) I have significantly more problems than I ever even dreamed were possable. They don't go away, they don't subside, they don't lessen.
They don't hesitate to call the benzodiazapines addicting, because they cause withdrawl and a contstant steady dose seems to loose its effect over time. Well guess what, citalopram (for me) causes withdrawl and it has lost its effect over time. I call that addicting.
Linkadge
Posted by ed_uk on December 26, 2004, at 20:04:37
In reply to Re: To Francesco, posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 19:40:39
Hi,
SSRIs are associated with physical dependence- the medical profession seems to be having great difficulty grasping this concept. I think that many doctors just don't want to admit that they were wrong. Also, they don't want to admit to themselves that the drugs that they prescribe on a daily basis cause a significant amount of damage as well as benefit.
As someone on p-babble pointed out not so long ago, the medical profession as a whole suffers from 'splitting' when it comes to drugs, rather than adopting a balanced view of a particular drug's risks and benefits, drugs are viewed as being all 'bad ' or all 'good'.
In the UK....
SSRI in particular are seen as being 'good' drugs.
Benzodiazepines are seen as being 'bad' drugs.
Prozac is praised. Benzos are sneered at. The last time I went to my GP he immediately gave me a repeat prescription for citalopram- no questions asked. My request for a *few* diazepam tablets was laughed at. He said: 'It was wrong of your psychiatrist to prescribe you any diazepam at all'. This is coming from a man who doesn't even know me!
The medical profession is unacceptably slow at accepting the side effects of the drugs that doctors prescribe. When the next 'cure all' turns up, patients' requests for SSRIs may well be sneered at.
Ed.
Posted by MM on December 26, 2004, at 20:22:00
In reply to Re: To Francesco » linkadge, posted by ed_uk on December 26, 2004, at 20:04:37
It would have been "unethical" to prescribe me a benzo when I first asked for one when I was about 14, but I really believe it would have saved me and my life could have gone a much different way. Maybe if I had told them I using alcohol to deal with my anxiety (since 12?). Then again that might have made them more reluctant...ah well. I was scared away from them for a long time, but always had a suspician they might help, and they did.
Posted by ed_uk on December 26, 2004, at 20:27:32
In reply to Re: To Francesco » ed_uk, posted by MM on December 26, 2004, at 20:22:00
>they made me bipolar
Hello,
Have you ever had a manic, hypomanic or mixed episode at a time when you weren't taking any medication?
Ed.
Posted by MM on December 26, 2004, at 20:32:43
In reply to Re: Bipolar Disorder » MM, posted by ed_uk on December 26, 2004, at 20:27:32
Nope, at least not until after I took medication, although you might be able to call what I experienced withdrawl. My "hypomania" presents as intense anxiety, I guess (I'm told). I did have true mixed episodes while on just SSRI's, but I haven't had them since being off of SSRI's (taking them alone).
Posted by ed_uk on December 26, 2004, at 20:45:56
In reply to Re: Bipolar Disorder » ed_uk, posted by MM on December 26, 2004, at 20:32:43
Hello,
Psychiatrists are not supposed to make a definate diagnosis of bipolar disorder unless a person has had a manic, hypomanic or mixed episode while not taking any medication. The fact that you had a mixed episode while on an SSRI is suggestive of bipolar disorder but it's not sufficient to make the diagnosis in itself.
Ed.
Posted by MM on December 26, 2004, at 21:04:09
In reply to Re: Bipolar Disorder » MM, posted by ed_uk on December 26, 2004, at 20:45:56
Well, technically I can be diagnosed Bipolar III I think, but maybe it was his "working diagnosis" or something, and since I got better with a mood stabilizer it is enough proof for him. I don't know. I and the people who know me are unsure of the Bipolar diagnosis. I did get a second opinion, thinking it would be something else, but he said he wouldn't disagree with the diagnosis, but maybe the way I was being medicated. I'm still wanting to get another opinion, but I'm not under my own insurance so I'm not totally in charge of my care. There's a lot of stalling for different reasons and I'm not always up to fighting to get certain things to happen. Anyway, I know you're right, but I am not sure what I can do about it. Not sure different meds would be good.
Posted by mike13 on December 26, 2004, at 21:19:08
In reply to Re: To Francesco, posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 19:40:39
>. Its a simple fact that I the *only* problem >that I had before I took SSRI's was that I was a >little bit blue.
>
>Same here and it really pisses me off.. my state prior to being on medication was not severe enough to merit medication (I was only 15, so it's not like I had say in the matter) in my opinion... I could have tolerated it without medication and I would have been MUCH better off... now I am stuck with these meds for life.. they have seriously screwed up my life...
Posted by francesco on December 27, 2004, at 5:45:13
In reply to Re: oh ya, forgot... - Francesco, posted by MM on December 26, 2004, at 19:30:00
> Hey Francesco. I understand what you are saying, but I do think that although this discussion is negative, that it is valid.
I think it can be valid too. I have had similar experiences and I thought similar things (permanent damages and so on). My point is that we cannot be *sure* that our apathy is dued to the meds we have taken in the past, and that we cannot be sure it will last forever. Morever I think that this kind of thinking make us more apathetic ! I experienced an awful period of apathy in the last three months or so but two days a week I had to go out of town for my PHD, and guess what, I felt less apathetic than usual.
Unfortunately I spent the other five days daydreaming about how by brain had changed after five different ssris : DBut, I do apologize if the negativity has been offensive to you (sincerely).
No offence, moreover I have written similar posts in the past, my point is not that your argument is not valid but that it's a total waste of time (and mental health too) thinking about the old good days and how our brain chemistry is messed up. It's just something I want to remember for myself ;-)
Francesco
Posted by francesco on December 27, 2004, at 6:18:57
In reply to Re: To Francesco, posted by linkadge on December 26, 2004, at 19:40:39
> It's not really obsession. Its a simple fact that I the *only* problem that I had before I took SSRI's was that I was a little bit blue.Linkadge I don't think they are obsessions as 'my mother will die if I don't say 'Jesus Christ' 33 times'. I actually don't think they are *necessarily* false. I think they are 'obsessions' in the sense that that they're unuseful and that they worsen the quality of your life. I had horrible experiences with meds too and I read all Breggin's books. So, I can emphatyze with what you're saying.
My other point is that reading psychobabble, thinking about dopamine and serotonin, prozac and celexa, bring us to commit a 'biologicistical' bias. We are not able to see anymore that our happyness or sadness depends also on how our life goes, how we imagine our future, our relationships and so on. We are just like the freudian psycoanalists who see everywhere inconscious problems, and this doesn't want to mean that the biologic approach to mental illness is *false*. This just want to mean that it's not the whole thing, that our brain chemistry is influenced also by what we think about all day long !!!
Sorry if my english is weird, I have not yet taken my Anafranil pill ;-)
By the way, in Italy benzos are prescribed like candies. But we don't have stimulants : (
Posted by francesco on December 27, 2004, at 6:20:43
In reply to Re: To Francesco, posted by mike13 on December 26, 2004, at 21:19:08
Posted by ed_uk on December 27, 2004, at 7:42:16
In reply to Re: To Francesco, posted by francesco on December 27, 2004, at 6:18:57
Hi Francesco!
>My other point is that reading psychobabble, thinking about dopamine and serotonin, prozac and celexa, bring us to commit a 'biologicistical' bias. We are not able to see anymore that our happyness or sadness depends also on how our life goes, how we imagine our future, our relationships and so on. We are just like the freudian psycoanalists who see everywhere inconscious problems, and this doesn't want to mean that the biologic approach to mental illness is *false*. This just want to mean that it's not the whole thing, that our brain chemistry is influenced also by what we think about all day long !!!
I agree with you entirely. Although medications often have an important role, it's important not to forget about the other factors which can affect our mental health.
>Sorry if my english is weird, I have not yet taken my Anafranil pill ;-)
No, your English is very good. I doubt many people on p-babble can write in Italian! Actually, I was meaning to ask you yesterday if you lived in Italy!
> in Italy benzos are prescribed like candies. But we don't have stimulants : (
Are they still prescribed like candy? Which benzos are the most popular? How popular is bromazepam (Lexotan/Compendium)?
A least you've got Provigil! It's strange how stimulants are unavailable in many countries yet they are widely prescribed in the US. In the UK, prescribing stimulants to adults is somewhat taboo.
Regards,
Ed.
Posted by ed_uk on December 27, 2004, at 8:37:22
In reply to Re: A little message to Francesco, posted by ed_uk on December 27, 2004, at 7:42:16
Hi!
Is this basically just saying that the stimulant Ritalin hasn't been available in Italy since 1989 and that it's classified as a schedule 1 narcotic? Does it say something about Ritalin possibly being made available in Italy in the future?
METILFENIDATO (RITALIN)
Il metilfenidato (Ritalin) trova indicazione nei bambini con disturbi
dell’attenzione con o senza iperattività (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder, ADHD). Anche se in merito esistono pareri non sempre
concordanti, le prove cliniche di efficacia sono sufficienti a considerare il
metilfenidato tra i farmaci di scelta nel trattamento dello ADHD.
Il metilfenidato è uno stimolante centrale: come tale appartiene ai
farmaci d’abuso ed è incluso nella Tabella I degli stupefacenti. La sua
commercializzazione venne sospesa in Italia nel 1989, su iniziativa
dell’azienda che allora lo produceva.
Visto il ruolo del metilfenidato nel trattamento dello ADHD, l’elevata
incidenza di questa manifestazione in età pre-adolescenziale e l’assenza
dal mercato nazionale di farmaci alternativi, la Commissione Unica del
Farmaco e il Dipartimento del Farmaco del Ministero della Sanità, in un
incontro, hanno invitato NOVARTIS, attuale titolare del Ritalin, a
presentare richiesta per la registrazione del farmaco e la sua
commercializzazione in Italia.
In data 18/10/2000 la Novartis ha comunicato al Dipartimento
Valutazione Medicinali e Farmacovigilanza la disponibilità per una rapida
registrazione e commercializzazione del farmaco.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
[email protected]
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.