![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
[email protected]Shown: posts 43 to 67 of 152. Go back in thread:
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 20, 2005, at 12:04:38
In reply to Here comes #8, posted by caraher on May 20, 2005, at 2:31:51
Posted by sunny10 on May 20, 2005, at 13:38:20
In reply to Here comes #8, posted by caraher on May 20, 2005, at 2:31:51
Posted by Gabbi-x-2 on May 20, 2005, at 14:09:05
In reply to Re: I'm playing- I'm just stupid (nm) » caraher, posted by sunny10 on May 20, 2005, at 13:38:20
to sunny
I hear she's going through a tough time.
(((Sunny)))
Posted by gardenergirl on May 20, 2005, at 15:28:48
In reply to Here comes #8, posted by caraher on May 20, 2005, at 2:31:51
Going for the obvious here...was it his theory of relativity?
gg
Posted by caraher on May 20, 2005, at 16:21:37
In reply to Re: Here comes #8 » caraher, posted by gardenergirl on May 20, 2005, at 15:28:48
> Going for the obvious here...was it his theory of relativity?
>
> ggAs you suspected, the obvious answer is not the correct answer!
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 20, 2005, at 16:40:44
In reply to Re: Here comes #8, posted by caraher on May 20, 2005, at 16:21:37
> > Going for the obvious here...was it his theory of relativity?
> >
> > gg
>
> As you suspected, the obvious answer is not the correct answer!The photo-electric effect. A direct implication of his quantum theory of electromagnetic radiation.
Lar
Posted by partlycloudy on May 20, 2005, at 16:56:02
In reply to Am I the only one playing? (nm), posted by Larry Hoover on May 20, 2005, at 12:04:38
I'm glad none of these questions were on my green card application or I never would have been able to leave Canada,
Posted by partlycloudy on May 22, 2005, at 6:09:24
In reply to Am I the only one who feels incredibly dumb?, posted by partlycloudy on May 20, 2005, at 16:56:02
I'm sorry.
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 6:44:19
In reply to Yikes! Didn't mean to kill this thread!, posted by partlycloudy on May 22, 2005, at 6:09:24
> I'm sorry.
You didn't. Sorry you feel the "last post of death" syndrome.
Probably I did, but I haven't had the last questioner confirm my reply as correct.
Lar
Posted by gardenergirl on May 22, 2005, at 14:27:30
In reply to Re: Yikes! Didn't mean to kill this thread! » partlycloudy, posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 6:44:19
I love it, another acronym.
> > I'm sorry.
>
> You didn't. Sorry you feel the "last post of death" syndrome.
>
> Probably I did, but I haven't had the last questioner confirm my reply as correct.
>
> Lar
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 20:54:49
In reply to Re: Here comes #8 » caraher, posted by Larry Hoover on May 20, 2005, at 16:40:44
A change of pace.
Multiple choice.
Which breed of dog is most closely related (genetically) to the wolf?
A) Russian wolfhound
B) German shepherd
C) chihuahua
D) shar-pei
E) poodle
F) Ibizan houndLar
Posted by Toph on May 22, 2005, at 21:12:10
In reply to I'm just going ahead with question # 9, posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 20:54:49
While all dogs are relatively closely related to the wolf, my guess is the Ibizan (f), an ancient breed. If true, has this genetic proximity been confirmed through DNA, Lar?
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 22:09:45
In reply to Re: I'm just going ahead with question # 9, posted by Toph on May 22, 2005, at 21:12:10
> While all dogs are relatively closely related to the wolf, my guess is the Ibizan (f), an ancient breed. If true, has this genetic proximity been confirmed through DNA, Lar?
The Ibizan that presently exists was shown to be a re-invented breed, no more than 200 years old.
Yes, this was a major study of genetic drift in dogs.
So, f is wrong. We're down to five breeds.
Lar
Posted by Shy_Girl on May 22, 2005, at 22:32:01
In reply to I'm just going ahead with question # 9, posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 20:54:49
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 22:39:11
In reply to Re:German shephard? (nm) » Larry Hoover, posted by Shy_Girl on May 22, 2005, at 22:32:01
Actually, the German shepherd was unrelated to all other shepherd-type dogs, and had closest affinity with boxers and mastiffs.
Down to four.
Lar
Posted by Shy_Girl on May 22, 2005, at 22:43:02
In reply to Sorry, Shy Girl » Shy_Girl, posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 22:39:11
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 22:48:22
In reply to Re: Cool facts :-) Tricky Q :-) (nm) » Larry Hoover, posted by Shy_Girl on May 22, 2005, at 22:43:02
I prefer to think of it as a well-written question, rather than as a tricky one.
But then again, I knew the answer.
;-)
Lar
Posted by Gabbi-x-2 on May 22, 2005, at 23:12:06
In reply to Re: I'm just going ahead with question # 9, posted by Toph on May 22, 2005, at 21:12:10
It would be the chihuahua, as it's a natural breed and all.
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 23:22:34
In reply to I think--Larry Hoover, posted by Gabbi-x-2 on May 22, 2005, at 23:12:06
Posted by Shy_Girl on May 22, 2005, at 23:23:43
In reply to I think--Larry Hoover, posted by Gabbi-x-2 on May 22, 2005, at 23:12:06
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 23:26:20
In reply to Re: Sorry, Gabbi darling (nm) » Gabbi-x-2, posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 23:22:34
I must have clicked the nm box. Sorry, there was a message.
The chihuahua, unfortunately, was one of four breeds that failed to display unique identifying genes (all others could be identified from a blind sample, after the initial analysis was done).
The other three breeds without consistent genetic markers were the perro de Presa Canario, German shorthaired pointer, and Australian shepherd.
Lar
Posted by Gabbi-x-2 on May 22, 2005, at 23:55:30
In reply to Re: Sorry, Gabbi darling P.S. » Larry Hoover, posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 23:26:20
Dumb game. I'm not playing anymore. :P
Posted by alexandra_k on May 23, 2005, at 5:37:49
In reply to Re: Sorry, Gabbi darling P.S. » Larry Hoover, posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 23:26:20
> Australian shepherd.
Is that the breed that is really american???
I saw one recently.
They look quite cool.
Kind of border collie like..
Posted by chemist on May 23, 2005, at 7:44:20
In reply to Re: Yikes! Didn't mean to kill this thread! » partlycloudy, posted by Larry Hoover on May 22, 2005, at 6:44:19
> Probably I did, but I haven't had the last questioner confirm my reply as correct.
>
> Laris the show still on? yours, c
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 23, 2005, at 7:49:33
In reply to Re: Sorry, Gabbi darling P.S. » Larry Hoover, posted by alexandra_k on May 23, 2005, at 5:37:49
> > Australian shepherd.
>
> Is that the breed that is really american???Before I go on, I'd like to say that I am not a dog expert. I find the genetics fascinating (genetype), and breeds also (phenotype). It is the interplay of genotype and phenotype that fascinates.
Genotypy is the specific form of the DNA; which variant, if you will. At a specific gene, sometimes there can be dozens of versions of the DNA (called alleles) coding for a specific trait (e.g. coat or eye colour). Phenotypy is appearance. Sometimes a phenotype can be produced by different, distinctive gene combinations. Usually, though, a stable phenotype (such as a breed) is produced by a stable genotype. That occurs only through inbreeding and selection, which stabilizes the genes.
Back to the Australian Shepherd. A quick google search confirmed it.....an American "invention", and one so recent the breed has not stabilized genetically. An interesting quirk is the preference for a merle coat pattern, pictured here: http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/australianshepherd.htm
As the gene that confers the merle coat also contributes to blindness/deafness, the herding capability of the dog seems to be secondary to its appearance. It's a dog show dog.
> I saw one recently.
> They look quite cool.
> Kind of border collie like..The only one I had seen looked like a border collie, as well. Shorter coat, shorter muzzle. Same mesmerizing eyes.
Lar
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
[email protected]
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.