Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's response-jmpjmp

Posted by Lou Pilder on January 3, 2015, at 19:26:08

In reply to Re: Lou's response-mmhaliz » Lou Pilder, posted by herpills on January 3, 2015, at 18:38:37

> > > I come here less and less as was fine till found this site and got caught up listening to people talk about meds. But honestly expected this site to be gone on January l. So who is running the site or paying for it. Just curious. And no not posting on admin why? No one is there. Phillipa
> >
> > P,
> > You wrote,[...not posting on admin why...].
> > The answer to your question could arouse speculation by readers...>
>
>
> Isn't it up to the individual to decide what was or was not the meaning of the original poster? Can we not speculate on our own without you insisting on some sort of clarification?
>
> You typically respond to posts stating that you are "unsure what you are wanting others to think"
>
> How about the people who read the posts decide what the original poster is saying or not saying?
>
> Frankly, I find it insulting that you think that other posters here don't posses enough intelligence to make up their own minds as to what someone is or is not trying to say. herpills
> herpills,
You wrote,[...you think that other posters here (redacted by respondent) as to what someone is or is not trying to say...].
Sometimes I am unsure as to what a poster wants others to think by what they wrote. And if the poster responds to my request with clarification to resolve the matter, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. This is because in my thinking , I would need to jump to a conclusion if I did not get the clarification requested. That does not mean that others could conclude by what is on the face of the statement. Sometimes statements could be ambiguous to me or just lacking in what I need to know in order to make a conclusion and I do not want to assume a conclusion that could be false.
As far as the clarification not coming, I can not respond accordingly, but others that think that they know what the intent of a poster is as to what they want readers to think by what they wrote can do so, But what if they are wrong?
Lou
>

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:1074753
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150102/msgs/1074776.html