Posted by SLS on April 2, 2013, at 9:43:52
In reply to Re: Long-term antidepressant studies » linkadge, posted by Scars R. Stories on April 2, 2013, at 1:44:03
> > Long term escitalopram:
> >
> > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16754413
> >
> > Long term mirtazapine:
> >
> > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9669186
> >
> > Linkadge
> >
>
> THESE ARE STUDIES FROM 1998? When Remeron was still classified and marketed as an antidepressant? Before they figured out they were wrong about the antidepressant bit but it makes for sleep that's deep as death. Are the past 15 years to be disregarded? I'm a graduate student and I couldn't get away with that in the sociology department! Dude! Point deduction!It is my impression of Remeron that you should suffer a deduction of at least two points if it is your contention that Remeron is devoid of clinically relevant antidepressant properties. If you are unaware that the true effective dosage of Remeron for treating depression is 45 - 90 mg/day, then another three points should be deducted. That's my opinion.
It is my hope that our opinions diverge for observational rather than theoretical reasons.
- Scott
Some see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.- George Bernard Shaw
poster:SLS
thread:1041418
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20130322/msgs/1041528.html