Posted by bleauberry on August 25, 2009, at 17:18:12
In reply to Re: amantadine helped me in the past ... but psychosis » bleauberry, posted by yxibow on August 24, 2009, at 23:47:09
Hey, I understand your passionate stand. That's cool. But calm down. You don't need to get so upset.
Forget all the debates going on here that are off topic from the thread. They are counterproductive to the topic of the thread. If you want to debate any particular topic in particular, invite me to one of the other forums of pbabble to make your case.
Back to the topic.
Jereon has an unusually troubling med history. Yet, through all the fog, there is actually a hint, a clue...Amantadine. In the eyes of an observant detective, that is one very powerful clue, likely to be unseen, ignored, or scoffed at by casual observers.
My point is, if Jereon were to explore the Amantadine ramifications, it would do nothing to further med resistance in the world.
Med resistance is mostly due to casual use of meds when they were not crucial. Epstein Bar and a dozen other nervous system viruses are very serious with marked psychiatric complications. I think the window should be open for Jereon to consider that angle.
As several international medical books state, "when treatment is not working, one must reconsider the diagnosis." In this case, Amantadine is a very strong clue.
I wouldn't suggest retrying Amantadine. There are much better ways to test, probe, and treat invisible pathogens in protocols that do not result in med resistance or missed diagnosis. Different topic though. Amantadine is simply a clue that a diagnosis in that direction deserves a closer look.
That's all. Just a humble opinion.
poster:bleauberry
thread:913511
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20090818/msgs/914053.html