Posted by mav27 on March 1, 2009, at 1:41:16
In reply to Re: new study finds no D2 dopamine abnormality in SP » mav27, posted by myco on March 1, 2009, at 0:35:17
> What previous study is that mav
>
>
> > So how do we know which study is correct? This one or the previous ones that found opposite results?
>Whichever ones it means in the article at the bottom.
"These findings do not replicate previous findings of altered striatal DAT and D(2) receptor availability in GSAD subjects assessed with SPECT"and this one possibly http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/157/3/457
poster:mav27
thread:883142
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20090223/msgs/883169.html