Posted by UGottaHaveHope on July 18, 2008, at 18:16:23
In reply to Re: 16 months on Nardil, posted by blueboy on July 18, 2008, at 11:21:16
That is very, very intriguing what you said, about Nardil being a "dirty drug" and how if I was not feeling some of those nasty side effect that it might not be helping me out as it should.
I realize it's justa a theory, but I believe it to be TRUE. I've never heard it described that way, but now that I have, it makes perfect sense.
Does anything understand, or feel the same way?
+ + +
>
> I'm actually a bit skeptical about your lack of side effects. Nardil is such a dirty drug. I hate to say it, but it is at least possible that the lack of side effects indicates that you aren't taking enough to get the full therapeutic effects.
>
poster:UGottaHaveHope
thread:840383
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20080718/msgs/840568.html