Posted by not exactly on February 3, 2003, at 18:58:47
In reply to Re: Selegiline patch » not exactly, posted by ZeeZee on February 3, 2003, at 16:12:17
I just re-read the Reuters article, and did a double-take. The article talks about the *first* trial of the patch, and doesn't mention any subsequent trials (or the fact that the FDA denied approval last spring). The trial I participated in (3 years ago) was the 2nd or 3rd installment (we weren't given any dietary restrictions because we were told that the safety had already been conclusively proven in previous trials). So despite the very recent date of publishing, the information that the article was based on was at least 4 years old! I would have expected Reuters to give a more timely perspective.
- Bob
poster:not exactly
thread:138787
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20030130/msgs/139187.html